However, the above mentioned observation is without prejudice to your legal rights with the parties, arising out with the over marriage of the couple, if any, pending before the competent court of law. Read more

For legal professionals, there are specific rules regarding case citation, which differ depending within the court and jurisdiction hearing the case. Proper case legislation citation in the state court is probably not correct, or maybe accepted, at the U.

Given that the Supreme Court will be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has long been arrived at, therefore the decision from the Supreme Court needs to generally be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) on the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more

In the event the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may perhaps dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't had a chance to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC could allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is normally only accomplished When the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. From the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence and also the petitioner company responded towards the allegations as such they were effectively mindful of the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use to generally be appeared into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more

thirteen . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some length, both parties have agreed to your disposal of the instant petition about the premise that the DIGP Malir will listen to the petitioner along with private respondents and will take care of every one of the aspects of the case and assure that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.

Civil Courts keep jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it requires legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be created and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more

Apart from the rules of procedure for precedent, the load specified to any reported judgment may perhaps depend upon the reputation of both the reporter as well as the judges.[seven]

168 . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Subject matter: Appeal At times it really is handy for a Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation to generate an attempt to dispose of a case on advantage and more importantly when after recording of evidence it has attained to your stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for advantage disposal when it has reached this sort of stage. Read more

Some bodies are specified statutory powers to issue steering with persuasive authority or similar statutory effect, including the Highway Code.

Summaries offer concise explanations of legal principles and significant cases pertaining to land ownership, real estate transactions, property rights, and related matters, assisting you in understanding the intricacies of land and property regulation.

In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges after the retirement of two years; and, is violative of the regulation laid down by the Supreme Court within the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. As a result, the competent authority with the parent department of your petitioner plus the Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release the pensionary amount from the petitioner and fork out the pension amount and other ancillary benefits for the petitioner to which he is entitled under the legislation within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority of non cognizable offence case laws your respondent is also directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits from the petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date. Read more

These lists are sorted chronologically by Chief Justice and contain all notable cases decided via the court. Articles exist for almost all cases.

We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy in the information contained on this site, or even the information linked to about the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can make inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming into the main case, It is usually a well-set up proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is subject matter to the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to reach at its independent findings to the evidence.